Sensitivity Indicators Analysis and Regional Sustainable Development Status in Indonesia

  • Bachril Bakri Directorat General of Regional Autonomy of Ministry of Home Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia
  • Ernan Rustiadi Department of Soil Science and Land Resources of Bogor Agricultural University
  • Akhmad Fauzi Department of Resources and Environmental Economics, Bogor Agricultural University
  • Soeryo Adiwibowo Department of Communication and Community Development Science, Bogor Agricultural University

Abstract

Indonesia is one of the largest archipelagic country in the world, with an area of 1,913,578.67 km2, and consists of 34 provinces, 415 regencies, and 93 cities. Since the end of centralistic governance under Soeharto's administration in 1999, Indonesia has adopted a decentralized governance system to deliver national and regional development. It has been noted that Indonesia has variations in social, economic, ecological, and institutional dimensions between a province to another province in Indonesia. This study aims to analyze the sensitivity of indicator and hierarchy of sustainability of province in Indonesia, using a scalogram method, and analyze the status of sustainable development of the regions, using cluster and flag analysis method. The research shows two most sensitive indicators, the ratio of paved road length to area width and the GDP per capita. Both of these indicators are very effective in increasing the sustainability of provincial development in Indonesia. Of the 33 provinces studied, 24 are at a moderate level of sustainability. Flag analysis showed that the SDG scenario is better than the NC-MEA and the BAU at Region I to III.

References

Erlinda, N. (2016). Pembangunan Wilayah Berkelanjutan di Provinsi Jambi dan Implikasi Model Jamrud. Bogor Agricultural University. Retrieved from http://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/81527

Fauzi, A., & Oxtavianus, A. (2014). The Measurement of Sustainable Development in Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan, 15(1), 68–83. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11617/4780

Jesinghaus, J. (2007). Indicators: Boring Statistics or the Key to Sustainable Development? In T. Hák, B. Moldan, & A. L. Dahl (Eds.), Sustainability Indicators: A Scientific Assessment (pp. 83–95). Washington, D.C.: Island Press.

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 17 of 2007 concerning the National Long-Term Development Plan Year 2005-2025, Pub. L. No. 17 (2007). Indonesia.

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 23 of 2014 on Regional Government, Pub. L. No. 23 (2014). Indonesia.

Nijkamp, P., & Vreeker, R. (2000). Sustainability Assessment of Development Scenarios: Methodology and Application to Thailand. Ecological Economics, 33, 7–27.

Poveda, C. A., & Lipsett, M. G. (2011). A Review of Sustainability Assessment and Sustainability/Environmental Rating Systems and Credit Weighting Tools. Journal of Sustainable Development, 4(6), 36–55. http://doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v4n6p36

Regulation of the Minister of Home Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia Number 56 of 2015 concerning Code and Data of Administrative Government Region, Pub. L. No. 56 (2015). Indonesia.

Regulation of the President of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5 of 2010 concerning the National Medium Term Development Plan Year 2010-2014, Pub. L. No. 5 (2010). Indonesia.

Rustiadi, E., Saefulhakim, S., & Panuju, D. R. (2009). Perencanaan dan Pengembangan Wilayah. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Saefulhakim, S. (2004). Modul Pemodelan. Bogor: Fakultas Pertanian IPB.

Shmelev, S. E., & Rodríguez-Labajos, B. (2009). Dynamic Multidimensional Assessment of Sustainability at the Macro Level: The Case of Austria. Ecological Economics, 68(10), 2560–2573. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.03.019

Spangenberg, J. H., Pfahl, S., & Deller, K. (2002). Towards Indicators for Institutional Sustainability: Lessons from an Analysis of Agenda 21. Ecological Indicators, 2(1–2), 61–77. http://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-160X(02)00050-X

Tong, C., Ye, W.-H., & Hou, B. (2006). Developing an Environmental Indicator System for Sustainable Development in China: Two Case Studies of Selected Indicators. Environmental Management, 38(4), 688–702. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-004-0352-y

United Nations. (2015). Transforming Our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. General Assembly 70 Session.

World Bank. (2009). Investing in a More Sustainable Indonesia: Country Environmental Analysis. Washington, D.C. Retrieved from http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/699081468040545730/Main-report
Published
2017-11-28
How to Cite
BAKRI, Bachril et al. Sensitivity Indicators Analysis and Regional Sustainable Development Status in Indonesia. Jurnal Bina Praja: Journal of Home Affairs Governance, [S.l.], v. 9, n. 2, p. 265-280, nov. 2017. ISSN 2503-3360. Available at: <http://binaprajajournal.com/ojs/index.php/jbp/article/view/287>. Date accessed: 26 sep. 2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.09.2017.265-280.
Section
Articles