Problematizations of Discretion Policy in Indonesia’s Administration Law Number 30 of 2014

  • Andi Wahyudi Center for Public Administration Studies and Government Official Training III, National Institute of Public Administration


This paper aims to discuss problematizations of discretion issue in the Administration Law 2014. Discretion is one of some discussed issues in the Administration Law which provides a legal guidance for bureaucrats to conduct their jobs. Drawing on Bacchi’s WPR (What is problem represented to be?) approach to policy analysis, this paper interrogates what ‘problem(s)’ is (are) produced in the policy document, what presuppositions are used as arguments to support the ‘problems’, what left as unproblematic issue that is absence in the policy problematizations, and what effects are produced by the ‘problem’ representation. The paper finds out that rules and procedures are the key concepts which assumed as policy ‘problems’ related to discretion issue. Neglecting the certain rules and procedures will be considered as doing illegal action. Only public managers have the discretionary power or managerial discretion, but in a limited room, because of upper manager’s intervention. However, this discretion policy remains an inefficient and rigid process in facing certain situation because, in exercising discretion, they have to obey certain rules and procedures. In addition, staffs do not have discretionary authority within their jobs although they might also face some certain situation which needs to make decisions.


Alexander, S. A., & Coveney, J. (2013). A Critical Discourse Analysis of Canadian and Australian Public Health Recommendations Promoting Physical Activity to Children. Health Sociology Review, 22(4), 353–364.

Bacchi, C. (2012). Why Study Problematizations? Making Politics Visible. Open Journal of Political Science, 2(1), 1–8.

Bacchi, C. (2015). Problematizations in Alcohol Policy. Contemporary Drug Problems, 42(2), 130–147.

Bacchi, C. (2016). Problematizations in Health Policy. SAGE Open, 6(2), 2158244016653986.

Bacchi, C. L. (2009). Analysing Policy: What’s the Problem Represented to Be? Frenchs Forest, NSW: Pearson Australia.

Barsoum, G. (2015). “Job Opportunities for the Youth”: Competing and Overlapping Discourses on Youth Unemployment and Work Informality in Egypt. Current Sociology, 64(3), 430–446.

Bastian, A., & Coveney, J. (2013). The Responsibilisation of Food Security: What Is the Problem Represented to Be? Health Sociology Review, 22(2). Retrieved from

Can, E. (2005). Nazaruddin Menolak Putusan Hakim. Retrieved September 19, 2016, from

Dwiyanto, A. (2015). Reformasi Birokrasi Kontekstual. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Hill, M. J. (2013). The Public Policy Process (6th ed.). Essex: Pearson.

Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-Level Bureacracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service (30th ed.). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Natalia, D. L. (2015). Siti Fadilah Mengaku Tak Tahu Pengadaan Alkes Terkait Flu Burung. Retrieved September 30, 2016, from

Payne, S. (2014). Constructing the Gendered Body? A Critical Discourse Analysis of Gender Equality Schemes in the Health Sector in England. Current Sociology, 62(7), 956–974.

Primandari, T. (2015). Dahlan Iskan Menang Praperadilan, Jaksa Agung Tetap Semangat. Retrieved September 19, 2016, from

Taylor, I., & Kelly, J. (2006). Professionals, Discretion and Public Sector Reform in the UK: Re‐visiting Lipsky. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 19(7), 629–642.

Thiel, S. van. (2014). Research Methods in Public Administration and Public Management: An Introduction. Oxon-UK: Routledge.

Wahyudi, A. (2016). Problematizations of Organizational Reform Policy at National Institute of Public Administration, Republic of Indonesia. Public Policy and Administration Research, 6(9), 37–46.

Wülferth, H. (2013). Managerial Discretion and Performance in China: Towards Resolving the Discretion Puzzle for Chinese Companies and Multinationals. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
How to Cite
WAHYUDI, Andi. Problematizations of Discretion Policy in Indonesia’s Administration Law Number 30 of 2014. Jurnal Bina Praja: Journal of Home Affairs Governance, [S.l.], v. 9, n. 1, p. 73-81, june 2017. ISSN 2503-3360. Available at: <>. Date accessed: 28 june 2017. doi: