The Linkage of Intergovernmental Transfer and Poverty in Indonesia

  • Heru Syah Putra Center for the Study and Education and Government Official Training IV, National Institute of Public Administration


Decentralization is expected to reduce poverty. Through fiscal decentralization, poverty may be reduced by optimizing intergovernmental grants. However, its effect on poverty is beginning to be questioned after some districts in Indonesia showed slowing performance on poverty reduction despite increasing transfer. Thus, this paper tends to investigate the linkage of intergovernmental transfer (IT) and poverty in Indonesia. By using panel data from 2005 to 2013, the linkage is tested using linear regression model. The result shows that increasing 1% of IT allocation will reduce poverty absolute by 0.12%, or 10% increase of IT will reduce poverty by 1.24%. The intergovernmental transfer also directly affects poverty gap and poverty rate. Increasing 10% of IT will reduce the poverty gap and poverty rate by 9.49% and 31.73%, respectively. Moreover, DAU (unconditional intergovernmental transfer) has a higher effect than DAK (conditional intergovernmental transfer) on poverty eradication. An increase of DAU by 1% will reduce the poverty number by 0.068%, in contrast, DAK only has 0.0418% to reduce poverty. However, as the difference is relatively small, the effectiveness of DAU on poverty is not consistent with the decentralization theory. Unconditional grant must have a significant difference than conditional grant on poverty. It may indicate that the DAU has been spent ineffectively and inefficiently. It may also indicate that it has been spent on not pro-poor policies. Thus, fiscal decentralization in Indonesia needs to be reevaluated in order to support poverty alleviation program.


Alam Siddiquee, N. (2006). Public management reform in Malaysia: Recent initiatives and experiences. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 19(4), 339–358.

Ali Khan, S. (2013). Decentralization and Poverty Reduction: A Theoretical Framework for Exploring the Linkages. International Review of Public Administration, 18(2), 173–210.

Beard, V. A. (2007). Household Contributions to Community Development in Indonesia. World Development, 35(4), 607–625.

Biltonen, E., & Dalton, J. A. (2003). A Water-Poverty Accounting Framework: Analyzing the Water-Poverty Link. Water International, 28(4), 467–477.

Bjornestad, L. (2009). Fiscal Decentralization, Fiscal Incentives, and Pro-poor Outcomes: Evidence from Vietnam (Economics Working Papers No. 168). ADB Economics Working Paper Series. Retrieved from

Cavalieri, M., & Ferrante, L. (2016). Does Fiscal Decentralization Improve Health Outcomes? Evidence from Infant Mortality in Italy. Social Science & Medicine, 164, 74–88.

Fahmi, F. Z. (2015). Regional Dynamics in a Decentralized Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 51(3), 484–486.

Firman, T. (2009). Decentralization Reform and Local Government Proliferation in Indonesia: Towards a Fragmentation of Regional Development. Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies, 21(2–3), 143–157.

Greenstein, J., Gentilini, U., & Sumner, A. (2014). National or International Poverty Lines or Both? Setting Goals for Income Poverty after 2015. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities: A Multi-Disciplinary Journal for People-Centered Development., 15(2–3), 132–146.

Hammer, J., & Spears, D. (2016). Village Sanitation and Child Health: Effects and External Validity in a Randomized Field Experiment in Rural India. Journal of Health Economics, 48, 135–148.

Hankla, C. R. (2009). When is Fiscal Decentralization Good for Governance? Publius, 39(4), 632–650.

Hull, T. H. (2001). Counting for Democracy: Development of National Statistical Systems in a Decentralised Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 37(2), 253–258.

Irawan, A. (2015). Regional Income Disparities in Indonesia: Measurements, Convergence Process, and Decentralisation. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 51(1), 148–149.

Khan, S. A. (2016). International Review of Public Administration Decentralization and Poverty Reduction : A Theoretical Framework for Exploring the Linkages EXPLORING THE LINKAGES, 4659(November).

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 33 of 2004 on Financial Balance between Central and Local Government, Pub. L. No. 33 (2004). Indonesia: 2004.

Lewis, B. D. (2016). Is Central Government Intervention Bad for Local Outcomes? Mixed Messages from Indonesia. The Journal of Development Studies, 52(2), 300–313.

Loayza, N. V., Rigolini, J., & Calvo-González, O. (2014). More Than You Can Handle: Decentralization and Spending Ability of Peruvian Municipalities. Economics and Politics, 26(1), 56–78.

Malik, S., Mahmood-Ul-Hassan, & Hussain, S. (2006). Fiscal decentralisation and economic growth in Pakistan. Pakistan Development Review, 45(4).

Mansoob Murshed, S., Zulfan Tadjoeddin, M., & Chowdhury, A. (2009). Is Fiscal Decentralization Conflict Abating? Routine Violence and District Level Government in Java, Indonesia. Oxford Development Studies, 37(4), 397–421.

Minister of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia. Regulation of the Minister of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia Number 06/PMK.07/2012 on Implementation and Accountability Budget Transfers to Regions, Pub. L. No. 06/PMK.07 (2012). Indonesia.

Miranti, R., Duncan, A., & Cassells, R. (2014). Revisiting the Impact of Consumption Growth and Inequality on Poverty in Indonesia during Decentralisation. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 50(3), 461–482.

O’dwyer, C., & Ziblatt, D. (2006). Does Decentralisation Make Government More Efficient and Effective? Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, 44(3), 326–343.

Okurut, K., & Charles, K. J. (2014). Household demand for sanitation improvements in low-income informal settlements: A case of East African cities. Habitat International, 44, 332–338.

Pal, S., & Wahhaj, Z. (2015). Fiscal Decentralisation, Local Institutions and Public Good Provision: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Comparative Economics, 0, 1–27.

Qibthiyyah, R., & Utomo, A. J. (2016). Family Matters: Demographic Change and Social Spending in Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 52(2), 133–159.

Schalembier, B. (2016). The Impact of Exposure to Other Countries on Life Satisfaction : An International Application of the Relative Income Hypothesis. Social Indicators Research, 128(1), 221–239.

Shah, A. (2007). Local Public Financial Management. World Bank.

Steiner, S. (2007). Decentralisation and Poverty: Conceptual Framework and Application to Uganda. Public Administration and Development, 27(2), 175–185.

Sudhipongpracha, T. (2016). Do the Poor Count in Fiscal Decentralization Policy ? A Comparative Analysis of the General Grant Allocation Systems in Indonesia and Thailand Comparative Analysis of the General Grant Allocation Systems. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 0(0), 1–18.

Sudhipongpracha, T., & Wongpredee, A. (2016). Fiscal Decentralization in Comparative Perspective : Analysis of the Intergovernmental Grant Systems in Indonesia and Thailand Fiscal Decentralization in Comparative Perspective : Analysis of the Intergovernmental Grant Systems in Indonesia and Thailand. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 0(0), 1–17.

Todaro, M. P., & Smith, S. C. (2009). Economic Development. Addison-Wesley.

Uchimura, H. (2012). Fiscal Decentralization and Development: Experiences of Three Developing Countries in Southeast Asia. Palgrave Macmillan UK.

Van, V. B., & Sudhipongpracha, T. (2015). Exploring Government Budget Deficit and Economic Growth : Evidence from Vietnam’s Economic Miracle. Asian Affairs : An American Review, 42(3), 127–148.

World Bank. (2005). Introduction to Poverty Analyses. Poverty Manual, All, JH Revision. Retrieved from

Yeoh, E. K.-K., Ling, S. Y.-P., & Shy, F. P. (2012). Fiscal reform, decentralization and poverty alleviation in the context of China’s 12th Five-Year Plan. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 5(2), 231–251.
How to Cite
PUTRA, Heru Syah. The Linkage of Intergovernmental Transfer and Poverty in Indonesia. Jurnal Bina Praja: Journal of Home Affairs Governance, [S.l.], v. 9, n. 1, p. 29-40, june 2017. ISSN 2503-3360. Available at: <>. Date accessed: 28 june 2017. doi: